Contributor: Candy Kaiser
I have attached a Community Resource List compiled by PATH, detailing the extensive support available in our area for individuals and families in need. This comprehensive list spans eleven pages and includes services ranging from shelters and housing assistance to mental health support, food programs, and even pet care for those experiencing homelessness. The breadth and depth of these resources highlight the robust safety net already in place in our community.
· Shelters and/or individual and Family Unsheltered Assistance
· Pet Health and Shelter
· Prevention Resources and Support for Children and Families
· Housing and Employment Assistance
· Navigation, Case Management, Low-Income Assistance
· Mental Health/Addiction/Recovery Support
· Overdose Prevention and Needle Exchange
· Domestic Violence/Sexual Assault
· Food Bank
· Food Pantries
· Food Stamps/Medical TANF Assistance
· Aging and Disability Support
However, recent discussions on social media and within the Grants Pass City Council suggest a perception that resources need to be increased. In response, the Council proposes allocating $750,000 of taxpayer money to MINT to purchase a building to serve the homeless population. This proposal raises several critical questions:
- Do we truly lack resources? As this list demonstrates, countless organizations are actively addressing the needs of vulnerable populations. Adding another initiative without clear evidence of a service gap could lead to redundancy rather than meaningful impact.
- Is this the best use of taxpayer dollars? While nonprofits play an essential role in our community, we must carefully evaluate the sustainability and outcomes of any additional investments. How will this $750,000 be managed? What metrics will determine its success?
- Why are non-taxpaying organizations benefiting from prime downtown properties? While providing valuable services, many nonprofits operate in buildings that do not contribute property taxes. As a result, the burden falls on local businesses and residents, who already face financial pressures.
This letter is not a call to turn our backs on those in need but a plea for responsible governance. Before approving more funding, the Council should thoroughly review the effectiveness of existing resources and collaborate with organizations to address any gaps strategically.
I encourage you to consider this proposal’s broader implications and ask whether we have unlimited funds to allocate to nonprofits without a transparent, accountable plan.
As a community, we have shown generosity and compassion, but we must also demand fiscal responsibility and effectiveness in addressing our challenges. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration.
