Contributor: Candice Kaiser __
I am writing this in response to Bill Hunker’s letter, which he wrote as a Precinct Committee Person with the Republican Party. While Bill seems concerned about money’s influence in politics, he should approach this situation rationally. I’ve attached his letter for you to look over.
First, it is crucial to recognize that various factors beyond financial contributions influence the political landscape.
Evaluating candidates’ policies, actions, and qualifications is essential rather than solely focusing on the money involved. The rise in campaign costs may reflect the increasing complexity of these costs, necessitating candidates to work harder and spend more to get their message out.
Moreover, accusations regarding attempts to manipulate candidates should be substantiated with clear evidence rather than anecdotal claims. Such serious allegations could undermine the integrity of our political process and may distract from constructive dialogue about the real issues at hand. Engaging in personal attacks or assumptions about candidates’ motivations does little to foster a cooperative environment for meaningful political discourse.
Acknowledging the accomplishments and efforts of current commissioners working under challenging circumstances is also essential. The assertion that they are the “least transparent” in the past dozen years should be supported with specific examples and comparisons to previous commissioners. Transparency can be improved through engagement and communication between citizens rather than through recalls that may further polarize our community.
As for morale in the courthouse, it is vital to understand that organizational change can be difficult, and dismissals may occur for various reasons that are not always visible to the public.
Instead of pursuing a recall, which can fracture community unity and cost the county upwards of 60K, I encourage all citizens to engage in constructive dialogue with their elected officials. This means attending county meetings, respectfully voicing concerns, and collaboratively proposing solutions. This approach can lead to a healthier political environment where the welfare of Josephine County is prioritized over partisan divisions.
In conclusion, let us aim to build a more inclusive and understanding community where all voices are heard and where we can work together to address our challenges. Engaging in thoughtful discussion and action will benefit our county far more than divisive tactics.
Candice Kaiser
Communications Chair
Josephine County Republican Party
————————————————————-
Thank you to PCP William Kronert for the following:
If you are considering signing the recall or know someone who is, please share this and familiarize yourself with the facts, the content of the petition, and the response to the recall petition. Here are several informative links and resources to assist you in making an informed decision:
Written out Rebuttal going point by point:
If you don’t have time to watch the interviews, read the rebuttal:
Josephine County: Commissioner John West Responds to Launch of Recall Petition
https://oregoneagle.com/josephine-county-commissioner-john-west-responds-to-launch-of-recall-campaign/
John West Recall Interviews and Information:
From Oregon Grape:
Exclusive Interview with John West
https://youtu.be/lDPaN2kqqa4?feature=shared
From Mike Jones Interviews (4 parts, from the petitioners to John West to Herman):
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLN3nuMBfm-XXRzMJQLymWuUnBGutUV-ql&feature=shared
Editorial: Say ‘No’ to the John West Recall
https://oregoneagle.com/editorial-just-say-no-to-the-john-west-recall/
OR Ethics Commission Dismisses Complaints against Josephine Commissioners
https://www.kldr.com/news/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1726742571&ucat=2&template=KAJO17Column&
Ethics Commission dismisses complaints against Josephine County
commissioners
https://kval.com/news/local/ethics-commission-dismisses-complaints-against-josephine-county-commissioners
